flyingfish1:

On Thomas possibly still being alive… I’m seeing some people calling it bad writing and I don’t see it that way at all. The only way it could
possibly be bad writing, as far as I can see, is if the writers were just
handing Flint his “happily ever after” on a silver platter without it being
connected in any way to any of the struggle he’s been through for the past
three and a half seasons. And that’s completely the opposite of what they’re
doing, imo. It’s intrinsically connected to that struggle. So much so that, as totally gobsmacked as I am that this is even happening omggg, at the very same
time it feels like it had to happen because how could anything else have
happened??? It had to come down to this because so much of the whole show, and
all of Flint’s journey, have been getting us ready for it.

The conflict is baked into the premise. Silver already said
it, didn’t he? “Wouldn’t you trade it all to have Thomas Hamilton back again?” It
seems obvious that he would—Thomas’ loss is what set him on this path in the
first place—but… would he? Could he?

Eleanor couldn’t, as she talks says later in the episode.
Max was literally down on her knees, begging Eleanor to run away with her, and
Eleanor wanted to say yes—was picturing herself saying yes—and instead she
chose Nassau. She chose her lifelong struggle to make Nassau a better place. (I
rewatched that episode a couple of months ago, watched Flint watching Max and
Eleanor, and I had the vague sense that Flint himself might have to make a
similar choice one day. As if he’s standing there, unknowingly watching his own
future. Little did I know… )

Max couldn’t do it either, when it came down to a choice
between Nassau and a life with Anne. After everything she sacrificed for her
own place in Nassau, Max couldn’t bring herself to jeopardize it for anything,
even that.

And the entire existence of his “Captain Flint” persona is
built around Nassau and his fight for it. The war is the reason “Captain
Flint” currently exists and “James McGraw” doesn’t. Just like Eleanor and Max,
he’s put every part of himself into this struggle. Into this island. “That
fucking island,” says Anne. “Makes you do shit you don’t wanna do. How is it we
haven’t figured that out by now? What the hell are we doing back here, Jack?”
Who is “Captain Flint” without this war? For the last ten years—or is it closer
to eleven, now?—it’s been his whole world. Could he separate himself from it
even if he desperately wanted to?

With Thomas quote unquote “safely” dead, Flint didn’t have
to think about it. Much. Except, for instance, when Miranda brought it up in
1×07: “What does it matter what happened then if we have no life now? There is
no life here. There is no joy here. There is no love here… If he were here,
he’d agree with me!” (If he were here… ahahahaha omg. This was always the plan.
I can’t.) And the very idea that Thomas could disapprove of his actions sent
Flint off to pretty much drink himself into a miserable, self-doubting stupor.
And yet he didn’t stop. He didn’t give up. He didn’t change course. Of course
he didn’t, because no matter what Miranda said, Thomas wasn’t really there in
that moment, and Flint didn’t have to truly address it.

So of course the next logical step is to (it looks like???) bring Thomas back
into play as a living human being with his own motivations and desires and agency. Talk about upping the stakes.

It’s like Jack and Blackbeard discussing what Vane would
have thought of their conflict with Eleanor. It’s one thing to make the claim
that you’re carrying out an action in the name of a dead man. It’s another
thing altogether to grapple with that person’s own perspective on the matter. “There
are moments… I wonder if I will ever be able to truly rest again until I know
that Eleanor Guthrie has paid for what she took from me. And then there are
other moments when I wonder if it would actually please him to see her dead… I
wonder if he were here now, watching us battle with the choice to kill her in
his name or defeat the governor and perhaps therein win the war we all together
started, if he might call us fools.”

Flint is thinking about similar things with regards to
Thomas: “I think if he knew how close we were to the victory he gave his life
to achieve, he wouldn’t want me to [abandon the war].”
“That wasn’t really what I asked, was it?” responds Silver. Because if Thomas
is alive, that’s not going to be the issue anymore. The issue is going to be so
much more complicated than that.

Trading “one irreplaceable thing for another,” Silver says…

Thomas was irreplaceable for James McGraw. But the war, the fight for Nassau, is
irreplaceable for Captain Flint. So who is he going to be, in the end? Flint or McGraw?

In 2×05, Miranda says, “There is no other way [than peace] to
achieve what you want to achieve… once you’re willing to tell the truth about
your intentions here. You say you fight for the sake of Nassau, for the sake of
your men, for the sake of Thomas and his memory. But the truth of the matter
is, it isn’t for any of those things… I think you’re fighting for the sake of
fighting. Because it’s the only state in which you can function, the only way
to keep that voice in your head from driving you mad. The one telling you to be
ashamed of yourself for having loved him.”

She needs him to acknowledge what she views as his true
motivations: and of course it all comes down to shame. That’s one of
the biggest themes of the show and it always has been. And again, with Thomas “safely”
dead, Flint doesn’t have to deal with it—can’t
deal with it—is prevented from
dealing with it—in any other way than just continuing the fight. Continuing on
in the same holding pattern he’s been stuck in for the last decade.

When it comes down to it, as far as I can see, the writers could have let things stand or they could have forced him to deal with the issue. The only ways to force him to deal with the issue were (a) by having him
fall in love with another man or (b) by bringing Thomas back into the story. I
had been assuming that (a) might happen because I thought (b) was too unlikely.
Shows what I know. But the trouble is that there aren’t really any other
options that can address Flint’s issues as well as Thomas himself would. In the “Are you going to choose to
live happily ever after with this guy or are you going to continue dashing
yourself on the rocks of your unwinnable war with the entire British Empire
over this island?” stakes, Thomas himself is the ultimate test case, really… it needs to be somebody we know Flint has a real chance of living a peaceful life with in the
long term, should he allow himself that.

“You were told that it was shameful,” says Miranda, “and
part of you believed it. Thomas was my husband. I loved him and he loved me. But
what he shared with you? It was entirely something else. It’s time you allowed
yourself to accept that.”

Accepting that means that he’d have no need for the constant
violence that he’s been using to drown out the voices of his own inner demons. Can
he do that? Can he put aside his own inner shame over the idea of loving
Thomas and being with him? Can he put aside his war, and go live a peaceful
life somewhere? Can he let “Captain Flint,” and Captain Flint’s war, go?

I don’t know. As I say, similar choices have been difficult
for other characters.

For his sake I just really, really, really hope he can.

I think for us, what made it compelling, is the cruelty of it. It is so clearly designed to tell a story about Rogers’ capacity for violence and his dominance over them, in what was meant to be a very bloody victory for him. I think what became complicated for us was, not only did it need to do all the things Dan mentioned in being a big noisy death for Teach but it was also important somehow that Teach save Rackham’s life. In a moment where Teach is bound and mostly dead and lacking really any agency, that was hard to do. This idea that just by not dying he saves Rackham’s life felt right. And I think as a Rogers story it was interesting in that Rogers thinks that he’s the star of the show and thinks he’s the one everyone’s going to be talking about tomorrow. And just by not dying, Teach becomes the star of the show and kind of makes him a hero in the moment when he’s supposed to be a prop. You understand why Rogers has to walk away and cut his losses and risk losing the narrative he was trying to tell.

Jonathan E. Steinberg, about that scene

There are some great quotes in this interview, but this is one of two specific ones I want to talk about.

I love this quote. Because it shows that the creators understand the point of having such a gruesome scene. It is there to bring the story forward, which is great, and highlight the cruelty of Rogers in a way which had not yet been made clear to us. 

But, as they say, it’s also fundamentally about agency.

Agency is a word we use a lot on tumblr when discussing in fandom. Usually it’s applied to female characters’ narrative and how they’re handled. But here it is also an absolutely perfect word to describe what is going on.

In a scene where Rogers should have all the agency, all the power, Teach takes command of the narrative. Through doing that, he ends up saving Rackham and probably most of the crew. 

Rogers was so sure of how this would go, and the longer he drags it out, the more he loses control of it. Teach might be bound and tortured, but by every round of it he survives, he’s taking agency away from Rogers in front of all his men. In the end, Rogers can’t continue without completely losing every ounce of credibility he had. Him shooting Teach is a victory for Teach. Teach was in command the entire time at the end. He forced Rogers to admit defeat by going up and shooting him. He also stopped Rogers, whether knowingly or not but simply by persisting, from doing the same to the rest, and to Rackham specifically, because Rogers would not have been able to withstand another failure like that. Rogers was drained of all his will to show off how in power he was. 

It reminded me of that scene in Jesus Christ Superstar (yes, I just made that reference), where Pilate orders the flogging of Jesus, and the longer he goes on the more painful it becomes for himself, in the end it’s even hard for the person flogging. Not to say Blackbeard is Jesus, and Woodes Rogers is far from Pilate, or showing any of the complicated emotions afterwards that he does, but he was very close to making Teach a martyr.

What was supposed to be his big victory turned into something small and insignificant that only made Blackbeard’s legend greater. The gore and horror in that scene worked not for shock but to highlight for us as an audience both to what length Rogers was willing to go out of desperation, and how badly Rogers was losing, because Teach pulled through. What was supposed to be a power demonstration turned into a demonstration of weakness. They highlight to us that this type of violence is not normal, it’s not by the book, and they do this through the horrified looks and silent acting from those standing around. These characters who’ve done terrible things are all standing around and looking in disgust and horror. 

That’s how you do a scene like that. 

(via mynameisjohnsilver)

bububububak:

Redcoats are red,

your eyes are blue,

I am ginger

and so is the man next to you….

…Seriously, what is he doing there?! Get rid of him! Geez…

                                                              Love, Jimbo

                                                                           xxx