disgustinganimals:

c-rowlesblogs:

disgustinganimals:

tastefullyoffensive:

(via bryaner)

This is not in fact a shit eating grin. There’s a distinct misunderstanding between humans and dogs when it comes to body language. The bearing of teeth in this fashion may resemble the smug smile of a human but is actually a showing of submission and shame as a response to the owner’s tone or aggressive body language. Additionally, it is unclear that this dog has properly associated this circumstance as causally related to chewing this remote. Dogs have very particular social memory when it comes to what they did, so a dog may act “well-behaved” when the human is around but “act out” when the human is gone even if they “know” what behavior is bad. To top it off, they are conditioned best when the action that they’ve done is immediately followed by a reward or punishment. Given too much time, if the offending dog ate the remote but was punished hours later, even with the presence of the destroyed remote it may be unclear to the dog what aspect of the remote was punishable. The action may be long forgotten which can lead to confusion and anxiety as the dog won’t understand what went wrong.

So, given all that you may still be asking why Disgusting Animals would be defending this canine?

Based on the shape of the bite marks and specific targeting of that section, I have to conclude that this dog didn’t chew that remote. Given these peculiarities and the unique shape of those teeth prints, the evidence points to only one possible suspect.

Jared Leto

@disgustinganimals I braved the google image search results for “leto joker” all to try to repair this innocent dog’s reputation. Please accept this piece of revised history showing the true villain here:

The truth is horrifying and I almost pooped my trousers because of this thanks